The area that appears to be causing you the most concern is around Knowledge Questions.
This means you are expected to argue convincingly regarding the knowledge issues raised by the quote. This then causes the existing knowledge to be discarded in favour of the new knowledge.
Bear in mind that discarding knowledge is not as common as what the quote is suggesting. Consider cases where the knowledge is not discarded but rather modified, added on to or corrected.
Finally, remember that the question is asking for KIs that are raised.
Or to argue that existing knowledge is never discarded. Never take the two extreme positions.
I can be modified, added on to or corrected. To bring out the KIs that are relevant. But I would recommend contrasting AOKs.
Do not, for example, choose Nat Sci and Maths, for the contrast is not apparent.
The new knowledge may sometimes make what we previously taught to be true no longer true. In this case, it is true that new knowledge causes old knowledge to be discarded. Nicolas Copernicus presented a mathematical model that proved that the earth revolved around the sun, and not the other way around.
For centuries, it gave meaning to a vast portion of the human population. Mainly it was based on faith and religion.
However, there is a difference between the AOKs here. In the natural sciences, the discovery of a new fact either adds to the existing body of knowledge or discards it completely. But in the human sciences, it adds knowledge, discards or it may provide and alternative explanation. This is because the natural sciences does not allow two explanations for one phenomena whereas the human sciences does allow it.
The two theories could be used together or as alternative explanations. Demand side policies were in place since Keynesian times.
When supply side policies were presented in by Herbert Stein a former economic adviser to President Nixonthe policy did not negate demand side policies nor cause it to be discarded. Both these policies are in existence today.
Not all new knowledge causes old knowledge to be discarded. In many cases, the new knowledge serves to back up the exiting knowledge or to create a greater understanding or even to provide a unified understanding, i. In such cases, it would be a gross error to say that new knowledge causes existing knowledge to be discarded.
The new knowledge did not cause the existing knowledge to be discarded. Rather, they worked together to fill in the gaps in the Periodic Table, resulting in a perfectly complete Periodic Table.Wordle is a toy for generating “word clouds” from text that you provide.
The clouds give greater prominence to words that appear more frequently in the source text. The ToK Essay Questions for the May Examination Series For , there are six questions for the ToK essay.
They can be seen below: ph-vs.coml judgments limit the methods available in the produ. If you're considering answering topic 2 of the May ToK essay titles, then I'd be delighted to receive your email: Title 3: "Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organisation of facts." Discuss this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge.
! 3! Introduction // a./ph-vs.com / ph-vs.com’s/most/ used/online/resource/for/TOK./Our/site/ provides/free/course/notes/on.
If you're considering answering topic 2 of the May ToK essay titles, then I'd be delighted to receive your email: Title 3: "Knowledge is nothing more than the systematic organisation of facts." Discuss this statement in relation to two areas of knowledge.
The International Baccalaureate® (IB) offers four high quality international education programmes to more than one million students in more than countries.